Skip to content
SAGHRO
PortraitHasso ou Ba Selem (Assou Oubasslam), portrait published by J. Robichez (1946)Prise de vue non datée (le catalogue situe les photographies du livre en 1937-1939) ; publication 1946J. Robichez, Maroc central (Arthaud, 1946) ; fichier fourni par le titulaire du projetProbable attribution— Identification based on a published or institutional source, without independent confirmation.

← People

Assou Oubasslam

عسو أوبسلامⵄⵙⵓ ⵓ ⴱⴰⵙⵍⴰⵎ

Chief of the Ilemchan (Aït Atta), principal leader of the resistance in the Saghro in 1933.

Born
c. 1890, Taghya n-Ilimshan, south-east of Tinghir (Hart 1984, p. 176) Confirmed by a verified source
Died
16 August 1960 Unverified information
Aït Atta
Affiliation
Segment: Aït Bu Tghuratin; lineage: Aït Tzukinnit (Hart 1984, p. 176), tribe: Ilemchan, at Taghya n-Ilimshan (Todgha, Saghro), sub-group: Aït Zemro (Beaurpère 1930; “Aït Zimru” in Hart), fifth (khoms): Aït Ouahlim, according to the classifications of Beaurpère, Spillmann, Hart and Niaaskalen, confederation: Aït Atta. Responsibilities: amghar n-tmazirt of Taghya before 1919, leader of the Ilemchan of the Todgha and the Saghro in 1930-1933, led families from several fifths in 1933, caïd of the Aït Atta of the Saghro from 1939 until his death.
Spellings
Assou ou Basslam · Assu u-Baslam · Ɛesu U Baslam · Hssu u Ba Salm · El Haj Assou Baslam · Assou Ou-Ali N'Ait Baslam · Aissa Ou Ali n Ait Baslam · ʿAṣṣū ū-Bā Salām

Biography

Assou Oubasslam is an Ilemchan: Spillmann calls him “sheikh of the Ilemchan” in 1930, and Hart specifies his lineage, the Aït Tzukinnit, and his segment, the Aït Bu Tghuratin (1984, p. 176). Bounfour writes that the “dissident” tribes of Bou Gafer were “led by Hssu u Ba Salm (Ilmshan tribe)”; Duclos mentions “El Haj Assou Baslam”, who negotiated the end of the fighting for the last defenders of the Saghro (“their submission”, in Duclos's words).

His attachment to the Aït Ouahlim goes through the classification into fifths, documented by three sources in the corpus. Lieutenant Beaurpère's table (1930) places the Ilemchan tribe, with the Aït Bou Iknifen, the Aït Aïssa ou Brahim and the Ignaouen, in the Aït Zemro grouping, one of the two groupings of the khoms of the Aït Ouahlim. Spillmann (1936) counts “Assou ou Baslam, of the Ilemchan” among the three notables of the Aït Ouahlim and reports that the Aït Atta divided this khoms into three “thirds”, one of them that of the Ilemchan and the Ignaouen. Hart finds the same two sub-fifths, Aït Zimru and Aït Hassu (1984, p. 11). These classifications by administrators and an ethnologist do not, however, confine his authority to the Aït Ouahlim: in 1933 he led, with his brother Basso, families from several khmas, and after 1933 he was caid of all the Aït Atta of the Saghro.

Hart (1984, pp. 176-178), who collected the testimony of his son, Qaid ʿAli u-l-Hajj, gives the biographical details: born around 1890 at Taghya n-Ilimshan, about twenty kilometres south-east of Tinghir; son of ʿAli u-Ba Slam, amghar n-tmazirt of his clan; himself amghar n-tmazirt of Taghya before 1919. A brother, Brahim, a son of the same name and a thirteen-year-old daughter, Fadma, died at Bou Gafer. The election as supreme chief in 1932 is reported only by encyclopedic syntheses.

On 25 March 1933, the last defenders of Bou Gafer led by Assou ceased fighting before Generals Huré, Giraud and Catroux. Saulay and Hart (after Huré) give two lists of conditions that do not match; according to Hart, Assou himself demanded that the Glawi's authority not extend to the Saghro and that customary law be respected.

After 1933, according to Hart (pp. 183-186), he was appointed shaikh, sat on the customary court of appeal at Iknioun, then in February 1939 became acting qaid, with the title of amghar n-ufilla of the Aït Atta of the Saghro, until his death “twenty-one years later”. In September 1961, Hart was received at Iknioun by his son, Qaid “'Ali u-l-Hajj 'Assu n-Ait Bâslâm”.

In 1981, asked by the Minister of the Interior whether he wished to resign, his son replied that the qaidship of the Aït Atta of the Saghro had been in his Aït Bu Tghuratin lineage of the Ilemchan “since the time of his grandfather Ba Slam w-'Ali”, and that Bou Gafer had only confirmed this command (Hart 1984, ch. 6).

Assisted translation, not validated

Uncertainties

  • Date of birth: “about 1890” according to Hart (1984, p. 176), from family memory; no civil record consulted.
  • Election as amghar n-ufilla in 1932: Wikipedia says so; Hart (1966, p. 94), after Spillmann, says the Aït Atta had a supreme chief “until 1926 or 1927”; Hart (1984, p. 186) states that after 1939 he was appointed by the French instead of being elected. See the comparison dossier.
  • After 1933: French Wikipedia mentions exile then appointment as qaid in 1956; Hart (1984) describes a continuous career as shaikh then acting qaid from 1939, with no exile.
  • A statement made during the negotiations is attributed to him online without a verifiable source: it is not reproduced.
  • Date of death (16 August 1960): English Wikipedia, unreferenced. Hart (1984, p. 186) says he was qaid from February 1939 until his death “twenty-one years later”, i.e. around 1960: the year matches, the day remains unverified.
  • Age: Spillmann gives him “about fifty” around 1930 (1936, orig. p. 84); Hart has him born around 1890, i.e. about forty in 1933.
  • Hart (1984, p. 180) also places the Ilimshan in the Aït Wahlim fifth, but by taking up the French estimates of 1933, Spillmann's: this is not an independent confirmation.
  • The attachment of the Ilemchan to the Aït Ouahlim fifth has been contested to the project. Rechecked on 9 November 2026 against the 80 documents of the local corpus: every source that classifies the Ilemchan (Beaurpère 1930, Spillmann 1931 and 1936, Hart 1984, Niaaskalen 2023) places them in this fifth, but these are classifications by administrators and ethnologists, partly dependent on one another. A source proposing another attachment would be added as a divergent position.

Sources — 10 sources cited · 9 independent documentary line(s)

  1. Bounfour, 1989 — p. 92Full text consulted · Academic research
  2. Duclos, 1967 — p. 23Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  3. Gérardin, 1987 — p. 45Full text consulted · Colonial military
  4. Hart, 1966 — p. 92, n. 2Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  5. Wikipédia (français) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
  6. Wikipedia (English) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
  7. Hart, 1984 — p. 175-186Excerpts consulted · Academic researchBiography from his son's testimony; career after 1933.
  8. Beaurpère (lieutenant), 1931 — tableau du khoms des Aït Ouahlim (PDF p. 73)Excerpts consulted · Colonial military
  9. Spillmann et al., 2007 — trad. p. 33, 68-69, 113-115 (orig. p. 39, 83-84, 140-143)Excerpts consulted · Colonial military
  10. Hart, 1984 — chap. 6, « Conclusion », 1re page (PDF p. 259 ; texte lu sur l'image)Excerpts consulted · Academic research

In the encyclopedia

Related events

  1. 1932Contested information

    Assou Oubasslam placed at the head of the resistance

    Encyclopedic syntheses report that in 1932, gathered at Taghya, the sections still fighting elected Assou Oubasslam amghar n-ufilla. The date and title are debated in the light of Hart.

    What do the archives say? →

    Sources — 4 sources cited · 4 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Wikipédia (français) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    2. Wikipedia (English) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    3. Wikipédia (français) — « Aït Atta »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    4. Saulay, 1983 — p. 62Full text consulted · Colonial military
  2. 21 March 1933 – 24 March 1933Confirmed by a verified source

    Four days of talks between the lines

    After an hour of “oratorical jousting” on 21 March, the Ait Aïssa ou Brahim agree to talk; on the 24th, the jemaa led by Assou Oubasslam declares: “We are still at war and we are not ‘Maghzen’”, and states its conditions (Saulay).

    ⌖ Bou Gafer massif (combat area)

    On the 23rd a local truce allows about fifteen delegates to come down; Assou, who had come with them, left on seeing that the artillery was still firing. On the 24th he asked to leave the Bou Gafer with the flocks and to return freely, weapons in hand, to the transhumance routes. When Commandant Boyé replied that they would be treated like the fractions already rallied, the jemaa dispersed in protest; the intermediary Ali ou Adda and Lieutenant Lecomte finally obtained an agreement in principle. Saulay also reports that a prophecy had led the Ait Aïssa ou Brahim to elect as war chief a five-year-old child of the Ou Ghezis clan, the only survivor of his line.

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 61-62, n. 2-3Full text consulted · Colonial military
  3. 24 March 1933Confirmed by a verified source

    Negotiations between the jemaa and the officers

    Duclos writes that the last defenders of the Saghro, “led by El Haj Assou Baslam”, “negotiated their submission”. 24 March is the date given by Bounfour as the end of the armed resistance and by Wikipedia as the start of negotiations. The terms obtained are reported in divergent ways.

    ⌖ Bou Gafer massif (combat area)

    What do the archives say? →

    Sources — 5 sources cited · 5 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Duclos, 1967 — p. 23Excerpts consulted · Academic research
    2. Bounfour, 1989 — p. 92Full text consulted · Academic research
    3. Wikipédia (français) — « Bataille de Bougafer »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    4. Wikipédia (français) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    5. Saulay, 1983 — p. 61-62Full text consulted · Colonial military
  4. 25 March 1933Confirmed by a verified source

    25 March: end of the fighting and aman agreement

    “On 25 March, exhausted but magnificent, they surrendered to General Huré” (Gérardin). Saulay places the scene at the small marabout of Khouia Brahim, before Generals Huré, Giraud and Catroux, and reproduces Huré's official telegram (no. 43/PC, 25 March, 11 a.m.). 25 March is also the date given by Wanaim (2024), Wikidata and English Wikipedia.

    ⌖ Bou Gafer massif (combat area)

    What do the archives say? →

    Sources — 7 sources cited · 5 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Gérardin, 1987 — p. 45Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Wanaim, 2024 — titreBibliographic record only · Academic research
    3. Wikipedia (English) — « Ait Atta »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    4. Saulay, 1983 — p. 62-63Full text consulted · Colonial military
    5. — « Anti-Atlas » — § 41Full text consulted · Academic research
    6. Hart, 1984 — p. 182-183Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  5. February 1939Confirmed by a verified source

    Assou Oubasslam, shaykh then acting qaid

    Saulay and Hart, read on the page images, describe him after 1933 as shaykh, then acting qaid from February 1939 until his death; neither mentions an exile. French Wikipedia states on the contrary that, exiled after 1933, he was freed and appointed qaid in 1956; English Wikipedia that he remained “grand qaid” from 1933.

    What do the archives say? →

    Sources — 4 sources cited · 4 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 63Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Hart, 1984 — p. 186Excerpts consulted · Academic research
    3. Wikipédia (français) — « Assou Oubasslam » — section Après la résistanceFull text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    4. Wikipedia (English) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
  6. 16 August 1960Unverified information

    Death of Assou Oubasslam

    English Wikipedia dates his death to 16 August 1960 and says he was buried in his ancestors' cemetery, in the commune of Imilchan. Unreferenced date; the year is consistent with Hart's indications for 1961.

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Wikipedia (English) — « Assou Oubasslam » — section DeathFull text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    2. Hart, 1966 — p. 92, n. 2Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  7. 28 February 1981Confirmed by a verified source

    First annual reunion of the survivors of Bou Gafer at Ikniouen

    According to Hart, the legacy of Bou Gafer is “vigorously upheld” by the survivors: since 28 February 1981 an annual reunion has been held at Ikniouen, attended by members of the government. At the first one, Mahjoubi Aherdane, secretary general of the Mouvement populaire, gave a commemorative speech in Tamazight.

    ⌖ Ikniouen⌖ Igharm Amazdar

    Hart adds that segmentary organisation, the five-fifths system, customary law and the “capital” at Igherm Amazdar, which he regards as inseparable from this legacy, were badly eroded during the first generation after independence.

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Hart, 1984 — chap. 6, « Conclusion », 1re page (PDF p. 259 ; texte lu sur l'image)Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  8. March 2026Unverified information

    A Resistance museum reported at Ikniouen

    In March 2026, ahead of the Bougafer commemoration, residents of Ikniouen and local sources quoted by Hespress said that a Resistance museum had been built and equipped, and that the former caïdat headquarters, the “qashla”, had been restored. In 2016 such a museum was only a recommendation; in 2024 residents still described it as awaited.

    ⌖ Ikniouen

    No document consulted gives the museum's official name, opening date, managing body or list of collections: SAGHRO therefore publishes neither opening hours nor descriptions of objects. The same article calls the old building both the caïdat headquarters occupied by Assou Oubasslam (caïd from 1939 until his death) and the headquarters of the resistance command.

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Aït Hssaine, 2026Excerpts consulted · Moroccan press
    2. Aït Hssaine, 2024Excerpts consulted · Moroccan press
    3. Kamal Mohamed (كمال محمد), 2016Excerpts consulted · Moroccan press

Source pages

  1. DocumentsShort quotationBordeaux, 1935, p. 306

    Bordeaux's portrait of Assou Oubasslam, quoted by Wikipedia: the quotation is exact. It is a literary portrait, not the testimony of an eyewitness.

    « Le chef qui les commandait, Asso-ou-Baslam, était un homme au beau visage grave, au corps maigre et musclé, impassible et indifférent d'apparence, mais fier et plein de dignité, et qui imposait la confiance. »

    Hagiographic biography published two years after the events by an Academician who visited Bou Gafer; the viewpoint is the French army's. The source's vocabulary (“rebels”) is kept in quotations.

    Document :
    Henry de Bournazel. L'épopée marocaine · Original document
    printed page
    printed page 306 · PDF page 304
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-08
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    55a1bef1f61ae190084fda4537de90d3f93e578a67fb10adc54a5927b62abd4f

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  2. CorrectsShort quotationHart, 1984, p. 176

    Assou's birth around 1890 at Taghya n-Ilimshan, previously presented as attested only by Wikipedia, is given by Hart from his family's memory.

    « Born about 1890 in the igharm of Taghya n-Ilimshan, about 20 kilometres southeast of Tinghir on the northeastern ridge of the Saghru, 'Aisa (of which "'Assu" is a diminutive) u-Ba Slam was thus about forty years old, and in his prime, at the fateful time of Bu Gafr. »

    Anthropological monograph based on fieldwork, including the testimony of Qaid ʿAli, Assou's son, and on the writings of French officers (Spillmann, Huré) which Hart translates into English. Printed page numbers inferred from folios read in the OCR.

    Source :
    Hart, 1984
    printed page
    printed page 176 · PDF page 230 (printed page number not verified)
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    baed3a3885756a778f6e958631d2cf2a7ad8a0d61ffb55569bb5cbea70841eae

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  3. DocumentsShort quotationHart, 1984, p. 180

    According to Qaid ʿAli, Assou's son, about 1,200 Aït Atta fighters defended the Bou Gafer; all clans were represented except the Aït Alouane, around a core of Ilemchan, Aït ʿAïsa ou Brahim, Aït Hassou, Aït Yazza, Aït Khalifa, Aït Khebbach and Aït Oumnasf.

    « Except for the Ait 'Alwan, all the 'Atta clans were represented there, even the small and impoverished Ait l-Firsi, with the core group consisting of the Ilimshan, the Ait 'Aisa u-Brahim, the Ait Hassu, the Ait Y'azza, the Ait Khalifa, the Ait Khabbash and the Ait Umnasf, in that order of precedence. »

    Testimony collected by Hart from Assou's son in the 1960s; Hart sets it against the French calculations, which are lower (about 1,000 fighters).

    Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Hart, 1984, p. 180
    Excerpt of the printed page (capture) · Crop of the quoted passage only, published with the project owner's permission (statement of 8 November 2026).
    Source :
    Hart, 1984
    printed page
    printed page 180 · PDF page 234
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-08
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    7377e1609745a43fab2aa2983e459bc5fefee1d20ef36ee23ebcfb0fe1a19ed1
  4. DocumentsShort quotationHart, 1984, p. 182

    On 25 March, the last defenders number 490 families, 2,900 people, 195 repeating rifles and 174 single-shot rifles.

    « Altogether, the last defenders of Bu Gafr totalled 490 nuclear families, consisting of 2,900 individuals armed with 195 repeating rifles (mostly French 1886 Model Lebels) and with 174 single-shot rifles (French 1874 Model Gras carbines) (52). »
    Source :
    Hart, 1984
    printed page
    printed page 182 · PDF page 236 (printed page number not verified)
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    9d4dc652c69635b641ffdf42261dbf6c66d663d8078506d52ff9fae4efba43a6

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  5. DocumentsShort quotationHart, 1984, p. 185

    According to Hart, Assou set two conditions: that the Glawi's authority not extend to the Saghro, and that customary law be fully respected.

    « 'Assu u-Ba Slam had imposed two fundamental conditions of his own during the surrender negotiation and had they not been met, he would have continued to fight. They were a guarantee from the French that the Glawi's authority would never extend to 'Attaland, or at least to the Saghru, and a further guarantee that 'Atta Customary Law would be integrally respected and upheld. »
    Source :
    Hart, 1984
    printed page
    printed page 185 · PDF page 239 (printed page number not verified)
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    8c2a9fa91e83dc02988ed1c034d1f1aecc025df3476b4dbfaf4b72db2ef8ca85

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  6. ContradictsShort quotationHart, 1984, p. 186

    Assou becomes acting qaid in February 1939 and remains so until his death, around 1960: Hart mentions no exile, unlike French Wikipedia.

    « before he was called on in February 1939 - the new courthouse at Igharm Amazdar having been built the preceding year - to become acting qaid, a post which he was to hold until his death twenty-one years later. His official title was amghar n-ufilla of the Ait 'Atta of the Saghru »
    Source :
    Hart, 1984
    printed page
    printed page 186 · PDF page 240 (printed page number not verified)
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    24a99b2574bec0c9efcd3f52918d89f2d64e6e1aba141010f994b2b34cb06714

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  7. ConfirmsShort quotationSaulay, 1983, p. 61

    On 23 March, during a local truce, about fifteen Aït Atta come down to talk; Assou had come, then left on seeing that the artillery kept firing.

    « Ceux-ci apprennent que Asso ou Baselham lui-même était venu avec la jemaa, mais qu'il était reparti en constatant que les tirs d'artillerie se poursuivaient. »

    Passage skipped by the OCR (seven lines missing): read on the page image.

    Document :
    La Koumia. Bulletin de liaison, n° 88 · Periodical issue
    Source :
    Saulay, 1983
    printed page
    printed page 61 · PDF page 65
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    f5a290a514750184b03d4a1c4c5f94f8804dc547b42cfed7a8ecd9f1bfa5d98b

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  8. ConfirmsShort quotationSaulay, 1983, p. 61

    On 24 March, the jemaa led by Assou refuses to be treated like the fractions already rallied; according to note 2, Assou asks to leave Bou Gafer with weapons and herds and freely return to the transhumance routes.

    « « Nous sommes toujours en guerre, disent-ils et nous ne sommes pas « Maghzen » ». Ils posent leurs conditions de soumission, qui paraissent inacceptables au commandant Boyé. »

    Account by a former goum officer, published in 1983 in the bulletin of a veterans' association of the Native Affairs service and based on French operation reports. The vocabulary (“submission”, “insurgents”) is the source's.

    Document :
    La Koumia. Bulletin de liaison, n° 88 · Periodical issue
    Source :
    Saulay, 1983
    printed page
    printed page 61 · PDF page 65
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    f5a290a514750184b03d4a1c4c5f94f8804dc547b42cfed7a8ecd9f1bfa5d98b

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  9. ConfirmsShort quotationSaulay, 1983, p. 62

    On 25 March, before Huré, Giraud and Catroux, the last fighters of Bou Gafer led by Assou lay down their arms; Saulay lists five conditions of aman, including keeping weapons after registration.

    « — soumission complète au Maghzen ; — recensement des armes possédées par les insoumis qui les gardent en leur possession ; — amnistie complète pour tous les faits antérieurs à la soumission ; — pas de confiscation des biens possédés en tribu par les dissidents ; — pas de corvées en dehors des impôts légaux. »

    One of the two consulted sources listing these conditions, with Hart (1984, p. 182), whose list differs; the text of the agreement itself has not been found. The presence of Catroux and Giraud, previously given from Wikipedia, is attested by Saulay and the telegram he reproduces.

    Document :
    La Koumia. Bulletin de liaison, n° 88 · Periodical issue
    Source :
    Saulay, 1983
    printed page
    printed page 62 · PDF page 66
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    3447a2e0efcfdca39041af138e9ce2b90a837159f533ae689fdc6ee54cf30c97

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  10. NuancesShort quotationSaulay, 1983, p. 62

    After the agreement, Assou is “appointed” amghar n-ufilla of the whole confederation: an appointment by the protectorate authorities, which Saulay does not date.

    « En outre, Asso ou Baselham sera, un peu plus tard, nommé « amrhar oufella », amghar supérieur, de toute la fédération des Ait Atta. »

    An appointment is not a customary election: this passage neither confirms nor refutes an election in 1932.

    Document :
    La Koumia. Bulletin de liaison, n° 88 · Periodical issue
    Source :
    Saulay, 1983
    printed page
    printed page 62 · PDF page 66
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    3447a2e0efcfdca39041af138e9ce2b90a837159f533ae689fdc6ee54cf30c97

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  11. ConfirmsShort quotationSaulay, 1983, p. 63

    Official telegram no. 43/PC from General Huré, dated from Giraud's command post on 25 March 1933 (11 a.m.), reproduced by Saulay.

    « Toutes fractions Aït Atta restées dans le Bou Gafer présentées par leurs chefs et notamment par Asso ou Baselham ont fait soumission à la zaouïa Khouïa Brahim, à onze heures. »

    French official document quoted by a third party: the original telegram has not been consulted in the archives.

    Document :
    La Koumia. Bulletin de liaison, n° 88 · Periodical issue
    Source :
    Saulay, 1983
    printed page
    printed page 63 · PDF page 67
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    970c44ba81a3aee3cc18b0d78236bae3291d87170ca4530726fdecee4f118d5c

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  12. ConfirmsShort quotationSaulay, 1983, p. 63

    After 1933, Assou works with the Native Affairs office of Tinghir, to which the Iknioun post is attached.

    « le capitaine Paulin fut chargé de faire renaître à la vie les fractions décimées des Aït Atta, avec la collaboration loyale et efficace d'Asso ou Baselham. »
    Document :
    La Koumia. Bulletin de liaison, n° 88 · Periodical issue
    Source :
    Saulay, 1983
    printed page
    printed page 63 · PDF page 67
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-07
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    970c44ba81a3aee3cc18b0d78236bae3291d87170ca4530726fdecee4f118d5c

    Reproduction of the page not authorised: reference and short quotation only. The capture stays in the project's private archive.

  13. DocumentsShort quotationBeaurpère (lieutenant), 1931, p. tableau hors texte (après la p. 264)

    In 1930, Beaurpère's table divides the khoms of the Aït Ouahlim into two groupings: the Aït Zemro (tribes Aït Bou Iknifen, Aït Aïssa ou Brahim, Ilemchan, Ignaouen) and the Aït Hasso (tribe Aït Kzad Ikhsan), with their sections and habitat.

    « Tableau de commandement succinct du khoms des Ait Ouahlim de la confédération des Ait Atta du Sahara. »

    Administrative table by a Native Affairs officer, appended to his note on the Todgha (Villes et tribus du Maroc, vol. IX, 1931); fieldwork in the 1960s confirms this twofold division (Hart 1984, p. 11).

    Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Beaurpère (lieutenant), 1931, p. tableau hors texte (après la p. 264)
    Excerpt of the printed page (capture) · Crop of the quoted passage only, published with the project owner's permission (statement of 8 November 2026).
    printed page
    printed page tableau hors texte (après la p. 264) · PDF page 73 (printed page number not verified)
    Status
    Quotation checked on the page image · 2026-11-08
    SHA-256 fingerprint of the private capture :
    4b386af6d4823042fabae069a4a8220e9ba71fbafd1a39e62e58a465aea86752