Skip to content
SAGHRO

← What do the archives say?

The death of Bournazel

What do we really know about the circumstances of Captain de Bournazel's death on 28 February 1933?

What the source says

Colonial militaryFull text consulted

Gérardin, 1987

p. 43-45

The assault began at 7 a.m. About a hundred metres from the objective, Bournazel turned towards Sergeant-Major Lelong's section (21st goum); “he had barely taken a few steps when he collapsed, both hands clenched on his belt: from a staggered low wall at the foot of peak 6 the fatal shot had come”. He got up again and tried to hold back his men, who were falling back; a second bullet shattered his wrist. It was 7.20. He was carried off by a few men, then by mokhazenis to the medical captain Vial, and died “very close to the summit”.

« à peine a-t-il fait quelques pas qu'il s'abat, les deux mains crispées sur le ceinturon : d'une murette en chicane, au pied du piton 6, le coup fatal est parti. »
Verified quotation

⚠ Commemorative account without cited source, probably based on military testimonies (Sergeant-Majors Lelong and Combémorel are named).

Encyclopedic synthesisFull text consulted

Wikipédia (français) — « Henri de Bournazel »

“On 28 February, obeying General Giraud's order to cover his red tunic with a djellaba, he went up to assault Bou Gafer and fell, wounded a first time, rallied his men, charged again, but was hit again. He died of his wounds.”

⚠ The djellaba detail does not appear in Gérardin; the section is unreferenced and probably derives from biographical literature (Bordeaux, 1935).

Encyclopedic synthesisFull text consulted

Wikipédia (français) — « Bataille de Bougafer »

The 28 February assault, “launched by the auxiliaries followed by the legionnaires”, failed; “the French lost more than 64 killed, including 12 legionnaires and Bournazel”.

Colonial militaryFull text consulted

Saulay, 1983

p. 58-59

On 26 February General Giraud has Bournazel ordered to wear a khaki gandoura over his red jacket. On the 28th, gravely wounded in the stomach, he gets up, is wounded a second time, then is carried back by two legionnaires.

« Le capitaine de Bournazel, qui vient d'être grièvement blessé au ventre, se relève avec une énergie surhumaine et se dirige vers ses goumiers qu'il sent fléchir. »
Verified quotation
Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Saulay, 1983, p. 59
Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Saulay, 1983, p. 59 ↗

Source pages : Bordeaux, 1935, p. 324 · Saulay, 1983, p. 59

Colonial literatureFull text consulted

Soubrier, vers 1946

p. 1363-1365

Around 1946 an unnamed sheikh tells the journalist that he was at Bougafer on the day Bournazel died, but did not see him go up to the assault; he admits he “may” have shot at him (“We did not choose our targets”) and adds that at that spot “it was a terrible mêlée”. The journalist notes that Bournazel had not put on his red tunic that day, and places his fall at the foot of a ridge defended by a steep slope, with neither inscription nor monument.

« J'ai tiré sur Bournazel... C'est possible ! Nous ne choisissions pas nos cibles... »
Verified quotation

⚠ Testimony collected thirteen years after the events, translated and shaped by a journalist in a heroicising account; the sheikh is not named. Useful as a trace of a local voice, not as proof.

Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Soubrier, vers 1946, p. 1364
Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Soubrier, vers 1946, p. 1364 ↗

Source pages : Soubrier, vers 1946, p. 1364

Colonial militaryExcerpts consulted

Spillmann et al., 2007

trad. arabe p. 114-115 (orig. p. 142-143, n. 31)

Spillmann, who commanded the Draa harka, does not recount Bournazel's death: he names him among the officers of the eastern group who were killed, after repeated assaults on 21, 24, 25 and 28 February that came up against the cliffs of the Bou Gafer; the command then confines itself to tightening the blockade.

⚠ An officer who took part in the conquest, writing in 1936; read in M. Boukbout's Arabic translation (2007), whose notes reproach him for passing over the violence of the blockade.

Oral traditionFull text consulted

Mellou, 2023

Arabic Post, 19 mars 2023

Family tradition published in 2023 by M. Mellou, after his mother, who had it from her own mother, present at the Bougafer: an unnamed fighter of the Aït ʿAïsa ou Brahim is said to have brought down Bournazel with a single bullet in the stomach, a silver bullet cast from bracelets and rings given by the women, the only one able, according to the story, to reach him.

⚠ A story handed down over two generations and published ninety years after the events; the silver bullet is a motif known from many stories. It attests a local memory, not the identity of the shooter. The author also attributes the silver bullet to a “French version”, after a 2001 article; no French source consulted contains it.

Colonial literatureExcerpts consulted

Bordeaux, 1935

p. 324-327 (témoignage du médecin-major Vial)

Bordeaux transcribes the “full account” of médecin-major Vial: Bournazel, followed by a red burnous, is wounded in the stomach (in the “right side” later in the same account), gets up, is hit by a second bullet in the right arm, then is carried back by two faithful men and a few legionnaires. He dies on the mountain after Vial's care, refusing to be taken down to the aid post. Bordeaux reports the order to cover his red tunic with a “grey djellaba” and calls the words attributed to him then “stupid and arranged remarks”.

« Bournazel, blessé au flanc droit, s'est relevé et, dans un effort prodigieux et meurtrier, il a gravi lentement le glacis jusqu'au pied de la muraille, retenant les fuyards de la canne et du revolver. Une deuxième balle l'a atteint au bras droit. »
Verified quotation

⚠ 1935 hagiographic biography; Vial's testimony is known only through this transcription. The detail of the wounded man “dragged by the feet” over the rocks recurs in Saulay (1983): the two accounts may not be independent. Source vocabulary kept in quotations.

Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Bordeaux, 1935, p. 326
Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Bordeaux, 1935, p. 326 ↗

Source pages : Bordeaux, 1935, p. 324 · Bordeaux, 1935, p. 326

Academic researchExcerpts consulted

Hart, 1984

p. 179-181

Hart writes that Bournazel, “the Red Man” in his scarlet silham, was killed in the fourth assault wave, on 28 February, “by a simultaneous bullet in the side and a stone in the head”. Assou knew his reputation but never met him.

« and in the last one, Capt. de Bournazel was killed, by a simultaneous bullet in the side and a stone in the head. »
Verified quotation

⚠ Hart does not say where the stone detail comes from; it is absent from Saulay's and Bordeaux's accounts. Stones thrown by the defenders are, however, attested by all sources.

Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Hart, 1984, p. 180
Excerpt of the printed page (capture) — Hart, 1984, p. 180 ↗

Source pages : Hart, 1984, p. 180

Comparison grid

Gérardin, 1987Wikipédia (français) — « Henri de Bournazel »Wikipédia (français) — « Bataille de Bougafer »Saulay, 1983Soubrier, vers 1946Spillmann et al., 2007Mellou, 2023Bordeaux, 1935Hart, 1984
Timehit around 7.20 a.m.not statednot statedmorning of 28 February; time of the wound not given (Fourré reaches the saddle around 7.30, Faucheux and Brincklé are killed around 7.45)not stated28 February (no time)28 Februarybombardment “a little before seven”, assault five minutes later28 February, fourth assault wave
Attirenot stateddjellaba over the red tunic, on Giraud's orderred “spahi uniform” mentioned for the previous dayskhaki gandoura ordered on the 26thWithout the red tunic (according to the journalist)not statednot statedorder to cover the red tunic with a “grey djellaba”; he has a red burnous carried behind himscarlet silham (burnous), highly visible
Wounds1st bullet (abdomen/belt suggested), 2nd bullet to the wristtwo wounds, not locatednot statedstomach, then a second woundnot statednot stateda single bullet, in the stomach (story)stomach (“right side”), then right armbullet in the side and stone in the head, simultaneously
Shootershot from “a low wall”; shooter unidentifiednot statednot statednot statedUnknown; the sheikh says he “may” have firednot statedunnamed fighter of the Aït ʿAïsa ou Brahim (oral tradition)not statednot stated
Placefoot of peak 6, Bou-Gafer EastBou Gafer, Jebel SaghroBougafersaddle before peak 6At the foot of a ridge, below the Aiguilles (journalist's description)assault of the eastern group (Giraud)not statedglacis at the foot of the Bou Gafer “wall”; death on the mountainBou Gafer

Our reading

The sources agree on the date, the general place (the assault on piton 6, east of the Bou Gafer) and two successive wounds. Gérardin gives the time (7.20), the firing position (“a staggered low wall”) and the second wound (wrist).

They diverge on the rest. Dress: Bordeaux (1935) reports the order to cover the red tunic with a “grey djellaba” and himself calls the replies then attributed to Bournazel “stupid and arranged remarks”; Saulay (1983) speaks of a “khaki gandoura”. The second wound: in the wrist (Gérardin), in the right arm (Dr Vial, quoted by Bordeaux), or a stone to the head together with a bullet in the side (Hart, 1984). Death: evacuated, he died that day (Gérardin, Wikipedia), or he died on the mountain after Vial's care (Bordeaux).

The detail of the wounded man dragged by the feet over the rocks, shared by Bordeaux and Saulay, suggests the latter partly depends on the former. As for the shooter, no written source consulted gives a name. Three voices from the defenders' side exist, all indirect: around 1946 a sheikh tells Soubrier he “may” have shot at him; a family tradition published in 2023 attributes the shot to an unnamed fighter of the Aït ʿAïsa ou Brahim, with a silver bullet; Hart, who questioned Assou's son, only writes that Bournazel was killed “by a simultaneous bullet in the side and a stone in the head”. The Aït ʿAïsa ou Brahim were indeed part of the core of the defenders, according to Spillmann as well as Qaid ʿAli: the tradition is plausible, not demonstrated. A name also circulates online without any verifiable text consulted; it is not repeated here.

These accounts are written from the attacker's point of view. For the Aït Atta, 28 February was the day the fourth assault was repelled; the command then gave up taking the massif by force and chose to starve it out, cutting off access to the water points of Akka n'Oulili and Akka n'Khouya Brahim and bombarding day and night, according to Huré's plan quoted by M. Boukbout (trans. of Spillmann, n. 34). Bournazel's death is an episode in the defence of the Bou Gafer, not its centre; Hart notes that Assou knew his reputation without ever having met him.

Assisted translation, not validated

Reading a colonial archive

Military reports and colonial literature are indispensable — and situated — sources: they count their own losses precisely, the enemy's rarely; they name their officers, rarely the Aït Atta fighters; they write to justify a policy. Oral traditions and Moroccan historiography ask other questions and have their own memorial uses.

Related events