Skip to content
SAGHRO

Method

Wikipedia check

Every Wikipedia claim that SAGHRO uses or discusses is examined separately: revision consulted, reference cited, source actually checked, result.

Method →What do the archives say? →

50 claims shown

  1. Contradicted by the sourcesBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    « plus de 80 000 hommes » (introduction) ; « 80 000 Français [Douteux] » (Déroulement) ; infobox : « 66 100 » + 7 500 goumiers + 6 400 auxiliaires

    The article contradicts itself (80,000 in the text, 66,100 in the infobox); both figures are tagged “dubious” or “reference to be confirmed”. No consulted source gives a total; Saulay only mentions 1,800 partisans kept in March.

    Correction · No verified total; do not reuse 80,000 or 66,100.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Gélard 2003 (« Luce »), réf. à confirmer
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 60Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Gérardin, 1987Full text consulted · Colonial military
  2. Reference identified, content not verifiedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    Aït Atta : 12 000 (infobox) ; « 7 000 à 12 000 Marocains » (texte)

    Attached to Gélard (2003, pp. 149-150), unreadable for us (Google Books blocks automated access). Consulted sources speak of “a thousand warriors” (Gérardin) and 400 fighters represented on 26 February (Saulay); families were present in addition to fighters.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Gélard 2003, p. 149-150 ; Wanaïm 2024
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Gérardin, 1987Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Saulay, 1983 — p. 58Full text consulted · Colonial military
    3. Gélard, 2003Bibliographic record only · Academic research
  3. CorrectedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    « 327 Marocains ont été tués, dont 127 femmes »

    The reference exists (Benadada, Clio 9, 1999, § 6) but it says “327 martyrs among whom 117 women”. Benadada herself cites Maazouzi and Alaoui (1987, p. 280), not consulted.

    Correction · 327 dead including 117 women, an attributed figure (not verified at its 1987 source).

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Benadada, « Les femmes dans le mouvement nationaliste marocain », Clio 9, 1999
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Benadada, 1999 — § 6, n. 6Full text consulted · Moroccan historiography
  4. The reference does not say thisBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    « 1500-1800 soldats tués (?) » (infobox, réf. Africultures) ; « 16 officiers, 85 sous-officiers et 1 800 hommes du rang » d'après l'interview d'un sergent (réf. Wanaïm 2024)

    The cited Africultures page contains no casualty figures: it describes the film and its witnesses (a French soldier, two survivors, a local manuscript). Wanaïm's text could not be read. The only tolls consulted are Saulay's for two days (22 killed on 23 February, 64 on the 28th).

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    africultures.com/films/?no=11161 ; Wanaïm 2024
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Baidou et al., 2010Abstract / detailed record consulted · Oral tradition
    2. Saulay, 1983 — p. 57-59Full text consulted · Colonial military
    3. Wanaim, 2024Bibliographic record only · Academic research
  5. ConfirmedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    Début des combats le 13 février 1933 (infobox et texte)

    Confirmed by Riser (§ 37: the conquest “began on 13 February 1933”) and Saulay (fighting “since 13 February”). Riser depends on Saulay: a single documentary line. Wanaïm's title gives 11 February; Benadada “January”.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Anti-Atlas » — § 37Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Saulay, 1983 — p. 60Full text consulted · Colonial military
  6. CorrectedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    La bataille « débute… dans les montagnes du Haut Atlas »

    The Saghro is the eastern extension of the Anti-Atlas, separated from the High Atlas by the Dadès-Todgha trough (Riser, “Anti-Atlas” entry; Hart et al.).

    Correction · Jbel Saghro, eastern Anti-Atlas.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Anti-Atlas »Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 5Full text consulted · Academic research
  7. Reference identified, content not verifiedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    Le 14 février, 117 mulets de la Légion capturés, 6 légionnaires tués ; un avion abattu

    Only reference: the “Ouarzazate 1928-1956” memorial site, which did not respond. Not cross-checked by consulted sources.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    ouarzazate-1928-1956.fr, « Jebel Sagho »
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. ouarzazate-1928-1956.fr (site associatif mémoriel), 2016Identified, not accessible · Colonial literature
  8. Reference identified, content not verifiedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    Le 15 février, « quelques familles demandent l'aman »

    Reference inaccessible (memorial site). Saulay dates to 18 February the first accepted aman request (120 Ait Yazza tents) and mentions three earlier contacts broken off.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 58Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. ouarzazate-1928-1956.fr (site associatif mémoriel), 2016Identified, not accessible · Colonial literature
  9. ConfirmedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    28 février : « plus de 64 tués, dont 12 légionnaires et Bournazel » ; Huré ordonne de rompre le combat et passe au blocus

    Saulay (p. 59): 64 killed, including Captains de Bournazel and Faucheux, Lieutenants Brincklé and Binet, and 115 wounded; on 1 March Huré suspends all major attacks to tighten the blockade. The figure of 12 legionnaires (Windrow, p. 18) was not verified.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Denglos 2018 ; Windrow 1999, p. 18
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 59-60Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Windrow, 1999Bibliographic record only · Colonial military
  10. Reference identified, content not verifiedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    20 février : « 11 réguliers et supplétifs tués »

    Attached to Denglos (2018), not read. Saulay gives no toll for 20 February.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Denglos 2018
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Denglos, 2018Bibliographic record only · Academic research
  11. Reference identified, content not verifiedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    Le 27 février, Lucien Saint envoie Alphonse Juin ordonner à Huré de relancer l'assaut

    Attached to Denglos (2018), not read; absent from Saulay and Gérardin.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Denglos 2018
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Denglos, 2018Bibliographic record only · Academic research
    2. Saulay, 1983Full text consulted · Colonial military
  12. CorrectedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    Le 24 mars, Assou propose une capitulation contre une amnistie totale, la garantie que l'autorité du Glaoui ne s'étendra pas sur son territoire et la conservation de l'armement

    Saulay (pp. 61-62) confirms the full amnesty and the keeping of weapons after registration, and adds no confiscation and no forced labour. Hart (1984, p. 185) reports the Glaoui condition, set by Assou. On 24 March Assou's conditions were first judged unacceptable; the agreement was concluded on the 25th. The source cited by Wikipedia (Gélard 2003) could not be read.

    Correction · Amnesty and weapons: confirmed (Saulay, Hart); Glaoui condition: reported by Hart; agreement concluded on 25 March.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Gélard 2003
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 61-62Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Gélard, 2003Bibliographic record only · Academic research
    3. Hart, 1984 — p. 185Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  13. ConfirmedBataille de Bougafer (fr) · Revision 239399687

    « Après cela, l'ensemble des tribus de la région se rallient au Makhzen »

    Riser (§ 42): the tribes “rallied to the Makhzen between April and May”; Saulay: 550 families of the upper Dadès and the Imdghas within two months.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Riser, « Anti-Atlas », EB 5
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239399687 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Anti-Atlas » — § 42Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Saulay, 1983 — p. 63Full text consulted · Colonial military
  14. Set aside for lack of evidenceBatalla de Bougafer (es) · Revision 163948334

    « 12.000 » Aït Atta contre « 80.000 » soldats ; « Francia desplegó 80.000 soldados »

    No reference for these figures; the French article they come from tags 80,000 as dubious.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=163948334 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Wikipédia (français) — « Bataille de Bougafer »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
  15. Reference identified, content not verifiedBatalla de Bougafer (es) · Revision 163948334

    « Más de 120 muertos » côté français

    Unreferenced; Saulay gives 22 killed on 23 February and 64 on the 28th, with no total.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=163948334 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 57-59Full text consulted · Colonial military
  16. Reference identified, content not verifiedمعركة بوغافر (ar) · Revision 76989698

    « 1300 شهيد » (infobox)

    Figure attached to an article by Jamil Hamdaoui on tawalt.com; no consulted primary or academic source confirms it.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Jamil Hamdaoui, tawalt.com
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=76989698 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Benadada, 1999Full text consulted · Moroccan historiography
  17. CorrectedAssou Oubasslam (fr) · Revision 240822222

    Infobox : « date de naissance vers 1880 » ; texte : « né en 1890 »

    Internal contradiction in the article. Hart (1984, p. 176), on the authority of the family, says he was born “around 1890”: the 1880 date in the infobox is contradicted. No civil-registry document was consulted.

    Correction · Around 1890 (Hart 1984, p. 176, on the authority of his family).

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=240822222 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Wikipedia (English) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    2. Hart, 1984 — p. 176Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  18. Contradicted by the sourcesAssou Oubasslam (fr) · Revision 240822222

    « il est élu en 1932 amghar n-ûfillâ (chef suprême) »

    Hart (1966) dates the end of the regular election of the supreme chief to 1926-1927; Saulay (1983) writes that Assou was appointed amghar n-ufella “a little later” than the agreement of 25 March 1933. No consulted primary source dates an election to 1932.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=240822222 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Hart, 1966Excerpts consulted · Academic research
    2. Saulay, 1983 — p. 62Full text consulted · Colonial military
  19. Contradicted by the sourcesAssou Oubasslam (fr) · Revision 240822222

    Infobox : « Exil (rappelé par Mohammed V en 1956) » ; « peu après la reddition, les autorités françaises exilent Assou Oubasslam »

    Saulay (pp. 62-63): Assou is appointed amghar n-ufella and works with Captain Paulin after 1933. Hart (1984, pp. 183-186): shaykh, then acting qaid from February 1939 until his death. No consulted source attests an exile.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=240822222 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 62-63Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Wikipedia (English) — « Assou Oubasslam »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
    3. Hart, 1984 — p. 183-186Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  20. Reference identified, content not verifiedAssou Oubasslam (fr) · Revision 240822222

    « Victoire à Tizi n'Tadart : 18 soldats français tués sous le commandement de son frère Bassou »

    Not cross-checked by consulted sources.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=240822222 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Gérardin, 1987Full text consulted · Colonial military
  21. ConfirmedAssou Oubasslam (fr) · Revision 240822222

    Henry Bordeaux décrit Assou comme « un homme au beau visage grave… »

    Exact quotation, read on the image of page 306 of Bordeaux (1935): “Le chef qui les commandait, Asso-ou-Baslam, était un homme au beau visage grave, au corps maigre et musclé, impassible et indifférent d'apparence, mais fier et plein de dignité”. A literary portrait by Bournazel's biographer, not a first-hand testimony.

    Correction · Quotation confirmed (Bordeaux 1935, p. 306).

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Henry Bordeaux
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=240822222 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Bordeaux, 1935Excerpts consulted · Colonial literature
  22. CorrectedAssou Oubasslam (en) · Revision 1370064159

    « the Battle of Bogafar erupted in the Saghro, Asef Mulul, and Mount Baddou regions »

    Two campaigns are conflated: Bougafer took place in the Saghro (February-March 1933); the Assif Melloul and Jbel Baddou belong to the eastern High Atlas operations against the Ait Hdiddou and the Ait Merghad (summer 1933).

    Correction · Bougafer: Saghro, 13 February - 25 March 1933. Baddou: eastern High Atlas, August 1933.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=1370064159 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Peyron, 2013Full text consulted · Academic research
    3. Gérardin, 1987Full text consulted · Colonial military
  23. Set aside for lack of evidenceAssou Oubasslam (en) · Revision 1370064159

    « civilian casualties in Bougafer were estimated at four thousand… the French forces employed systematic genocide »

    The only reference is a blog (milafattadla.com) without sources; no consulted source gives this figure or describes the events this way.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    milafattadla.com
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=1370064159 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Benadada, 1999Full text consulted · Moroccan historiography
  24. Reference identified, content not verifiedAssou Oubasslam (en) · Revision 1370064159

    Mort le 16 août 1960 ; inhumé au cimetière de ses ancêtres (commune d'Imilchan)

    Reference: an unsourced blog. The year is consistent with Hart (1984, p. 186: qaid from February 1939 until his death “twenty-one years later”); the day and burial place remain unverified.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    milafattadla.com
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=1370064159 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Hart, 1984 — p. 186Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  25. CorrectedAssou Oubasslam (en) · Revision 1370064159

    « After the Battle of Bougafer, he remained Grand Qaid and amghar n-ufilla of the Ait Atta until his death »

    Saulay confirms his appointment as amghar n-ufella after March 1933; Hart (1984, p. 186) says he was shaykh, then acting qaid from February 1939 until his death, with the official title of amghar n-ufilla of the Aït Atta of the Saghro. He was therefore not “Grand Qaid” from 1933.

    Correction · Shaykh after 1933, acting qaid from February 1939 until his death (Hart).

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=1370064159 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 62Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Hart, 1984 — p. 186Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  26. CorrectedAït Atta (fr) · Revision 238989242

    Référence : David Hart, Dadda 'Atta and His Forty Grandsons…, Cambridge, 1961

    The book appeared in 1981 (Open Library: MENAS Press / Westview, 260 pp., ISBN 0-906559-06-5 and 0-906559-07-3).

    Correction · 1981.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=238989242 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Internet Archive, 2026Full text consulted · Geographic data
  27. Contradicted by the sourcesAït Atta (fr) · Revision 238989242

    Une tradition « reprise localement » rattache les Berbères du Maroc à Jallut (Goliath)… y compris, selon certaines versions tardives, celle des Aït Atta

    Hart (1978, p. 56) writes that descent from Goliath was a claim “now generally abandoned or forgotten” and that he “certainly never heard” among the Ait Atta the tradition of their descent from the sons of 'Atta. Peyron (EB XVI) ranks Djalut among the “genealogical fictions” of medieval chroniclers.

    Correction · Medieval genealogical fiction; not attested as an Ait Atta tradition by Hart.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Hart, Dadda 'Atta… (daté 1961), p. 1
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=238989242 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 3 sources cited · 3 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Hart, 1978 — p. 56Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Édisud — « Djalut (Jalut, Goliath) »Full text consulted · Academic research
    3. Shatzmiller, 1983 — p. 146-147Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  28. ConfirmedAït Atta (fr) · Revision 238989242

    Population : 38 000 en 1936 (Spillmann), environ 135 000 en 1960 (Hart)

    Confirmed by the Hart, Morin-Barde and Trecolle entry (EB 7, § 6), which reports Spillmann's estimate.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Encyclopédie berbère
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=238989242 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 6Full text consulted · Academic research
  29. Contradicted by the sourcesAït Atta (fr) · Revision 238989242

    « En 1932, Assou Oubaslam est élu amghar n-ûfillâ par les dernières fractions résistant aux troupes françaises »

    See the Assou Oubasslam article: Hart dates the last regular election to 1926-1927; Saulay speaks of an appointment after March 1933.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=238989242 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Hart, 1966Excerpts consulted · Academic research
    2. Saulay, 1983 — p. 62Full text consulted · Colonial military
  30. Contradicted by the sourcesAit Atta (en) · Revision 1381562362

    « A tradition of non-Atta origin claims that the Ait Atta descends from Goliath (Jalut)… According to the third tradition, 'Atta had 6 sons… These are the clans of the Ait Atta »

    Hart 1984, consulted in the local corpus, does present descent from Goliath as “A Non-'Atta Tradition” (p. 40, read on the image): on this point Wikipedia's wording matches its source. However, Hart (1978, p. 56) states that descent from the six sons of 'Atta is “a tradition which I certainly never heard in 'Attaland”. The second reference (Peyron and Camps, “Hadiddou”, EB 21) does not mention Jalut.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Hart 1984, p. 40-42 ; Peyron & Camps, « Hadiddou », EB 21
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=1381562362 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 4 sources cited · 4 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Hadiddou »Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Hart, 1978 — p. 56Full text consulted · Academic research
    3. Édisud — « Djalut (Jalut, Goliath) »Full text consulted · Academic research
    4. Hart, 1984 — p. 40Excerpts consulted · Academic research
  31. ConfirmedAit Atta (en) · Revision 1381562362

    Première mention européenne par Marmol Carvajal en 1571 (« Ytata »)

    Confirmed by Hart, Morin-Barde and Trecolle (EB 7, § 1).

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Hart 1984, p. 54, 79
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=1381562362 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 1Full text consulted · Academic research
  32. ConfirmedAit Atta (en) · Revision 1381562362

    38 000 (Spillmann, 1936) ; 76 000 (Hart, 1939) ; 125 000-135 000 (1960)

    38,000 and 135,000 confirmed by the Encyclopédie berbère; the figure of 76,000 in 1939 was not verified.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=1381562362 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 6Full text consulted · Academic research
  33. ConfirmedDadda Atta (fr) · Revision 231340331

    « Dadda 'Atta est une figure semi légendaire et fondatrice »

    Agrees with Hart et al.: a figure “not entirely legendary”, known through “more or less legendary” stories.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=231340331 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 2-3Full text consulted · Academic research
  34. Set aside for lack of evidenceDadda Atta (fr) · Revision 231340331

    Infobox : naissance « milieu XVIe siècle », activité « amghar », titre « Amghar n'oufella », formation « Zaouïa de Tamesloht, Zaouiat Ahansal »

    The infobox turns elements of oral tradition into biographical data, without a source; no contemporary document mentions Dadda 'Atta.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=231340331 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 3Full text consulted · Academic research
  35. ConfirmedDadda Atta (fr) · Revision 231340331

    Mort au combat contre les Banu Maaqil ; enterré à Taqqat n-Ilktawen, près de Tagounite

    Reported by Hart et al. (§ 3), who consider it “almost certain” while linking it to tradition.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=231340331 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « 'Atta (Ayt) » — § 3Full text consulted · Academic research
  36. CorrectedDadda Atta (fr) · Revision 231340331

    Hart, The Ait Atta of Southern Morocco, 1984, ISBN 0 906559 04 9, 280 pages

    Open Library: ISBN 0-906559-15-4, 219 pages.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=231340331 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Internet Archive, 2026Full text consulted · Geographic data
  37. Reference identified, content not verifiedDadda Atta (fr) · Revision 231340331

    « Wa ḥaqq Dadda 'Atta, mā yaʿṭā mā-nīn yaʿṭā, wal-ḥā ywallī Jbel Saghro ṭṭā »

    Wording attached to the Ma'lamat al-Maghrib (unofficial copy on archive.org), not consulted. The meaning is independently attested by Riser (§ 35): “Father 'Atta swore he would not pay, even if the Sarhro became a plain”.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    Ma'lamat al-Maghrib
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=231340331 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Anti-Atlas » — § 35Full text consulted · Academic research
  38. Reference identified, content not verifiedZaïd Ou Hsaïn Ou Skounti (fr) · Revision 236188045

    « né vers 1890 à Taskountit dans l'Ighfaman »

    The article has carried a “needs sources” banner since January 2013 and contains no references.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=236188045 · 2026-11-07
  39. ConfirmedZaïd Ou Hsaïn Ou Skounti (fr) · Revision 236188045

    Les Aït Merghad « faisaient partie de la grande tribu des Aït Atta et ont ensuite rejoint les Aït Yafelman »

    Peyron (EB 31): the Ait Merghad, originally part of the Ait Atta, split from them around 1645 and joined the Ait Yafelman. In 1933 they were therefore not Ait Atta.

    Correction · In 1933: Ait Merghad, Ait Yafelman confederation.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=236188045 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Merghad, Ayt (Ayt Merγad) » — § 1Full text consulted · Academic research
  40. Reference identified, content not verifiedZaïd Ou Hsaïn Ou Skounti (fr) · Revision 236188045

    Reçu le 29 août 1933 par le général Giraud à Assoul

    Unreferenced; Yabiladi dates the surrender of the last fighters to 29 August; Peyron reports the surrender without a date.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=236188045 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Benargane, 2025Full text consulted · Moroccan press
    2. Peyron, 2013Full text consulted · Academic research
  41. Contradicted by the sourcesZaïd Ou Hsaïn Ou Skounti (fr) · Revision 236188045

    Mort le 10 juillet 1943 « dans un accident de chasse » ; plus bas : « très probablement assassiné »

    Internal contradiction; Arabic Wikipedia speaks of a commissioned assassination. No primary source consulted.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=236188045 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. ويكيبيديا (العربية) — « زايد أوسكونتي »Full text consulted · Encyclopedic synthesis
  42. CorrectedZaïd Ou Hsaïn Ou Skounti (fr) · Revision 236188045

    Bibliographie : articles de La Vigie marocaine (1936) « après la mort de Zaïd ou Ahmed » ; lien « Zaïd ou Ahmed »

    Zayd ou-Hmad is another person, also Ait Merghad, who fought until 1936 (Peyron, EB 31). Yabiladi merges the two names.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=236188045 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Merghad, Ayt (Ayt Merγad) » — § 7Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Benargane, 2025Full text consulted · Moroccan press
  43. Reference identified, content not verifiedZaïd Ou Hsaïn Ou Skounti (fr) · Revision 236188045

    « plan militaire élaboré par pas moins de quatre généraux » ; « des centaines de morts, des milliers de têtes de cheptel tués »

    Unreferenced; no consulted source quantifies the Baddou losses.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=236188045 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Peyron, 2013Full text consulted · Academic research
  44. Reference identified, content not verifiedزايد أوسكونتي (ar) · Revision 76211137

    Tué « dans un incident organisé par un agent de la France », poussé du haut d'un pic appelé Brouj

    Attached to an agora.ma article (2012); not verified.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    agora.ma, 2012
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=76211137 · 2026-11-07
  45. Confirmedمعركة بادو (ar) · Revision 69896996

    Bataille en août 1933, menée par Zayd ou-Skounti, Ali ou Termoun et Moha ou Arji, contre cinq généraux dont Giraud, Catroux et Huré ; près d'Aghbalou n-Kerdous ; fin par reddition et trêve

    Date, place and main leaders agree with Peyron (2013) and the MAP dispatch (2021). Catroux's role and the presence of “five generals” are not confirmed.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    mapnews.ma ; zamane.ma
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=69896996 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Peyron, 2013Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Le Matin (dépêche MAP / Haut-Commissariat aux anciens résistants), 2021Full text consulted · Moroccan historiography
  46. Set aside for lack of evidenceمعركة بادو (ar) · Revision 69896996

    Infobox : photographie « مدفعية كانون فرنسية بجبل بادو » (artillerie française au Jbel Baddou)

    The Commons file was uploaded in 2022 as “own work” (CC BY-SA 4.0), 300 × 203 px, with no source or date: a 1933 photograph cannot be the uploader's work. Image set aside: attribution and licence not credible.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=69896996 · 2026-11-07
  47. Contradicted by the sourcesBataille de Tazizaoute (fr) · Revision 238030286

    « Ce bastion de résistance est vaincu, contre la résistance de Mouha Ou Hammou Zayani, celle de Mouha Ou Saïd Ouirra… »

    Peyron (2013) attributes the leadership of Tazizaout (1932) to Sidi Lmekki Amhaouch and mentions Moha ou Hammou only for consultations before 1918-1919. His presence in 1932 is attested by no consulted source.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=238030286 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 1 sources cited · 1 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Peyron, 2013Full text consulted · Academic research
  48. Contradicted by the sourcesAït Yafelman (fr) · Revision 234411297

    Pacte de 1645-1646 conclu dans l'enceinte de la zaouïa d'Assoul

    Peyron (EB 31) reports two versions: a confederation existing in 1645 (Henry) or an alliance prompted in the late 17th century by Moulay Ismail; the date remains debated.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    medium
    Revision
    oldid=234411297 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. — « Merghad, Ayt (Ayt Merγad) » — § 3Full text consulted · Academic research
    2. Hart, 1978 — p. 56Full text consulted · Academic research
  49. CorrectedHenri de Bournazel (fr) · Revision 239467469

    Le 28 février, « obéissant à l'ordre du général Giraud de recouvrir d'une djellaba sa tunique rouge »

    Saulay (p. 58): the order is passed on 26 February by Lieutenant Pothuau and concerns a “khaki gandoura”. Bordeaux (1935, p. 324) speaks of a “grey djellaba” and calls the replies then attributed to Bournazel “stupid and contrived remarks”.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    high
    Revision
    oldid=239467469 · 2026-11-07

    Sources actually checked

    Sources — 2 sources cited · 2 independent documentary line(s)

    1. Saulay, 1983 — p. 58Full text consulted · Colonial military
    2. Bordeaux, 1935 — p. 324Excerpts consulted · Colonial literature
  50. Contradicted by the sourcesAntoine Huré (fr) · Revision 240468951

    Infobox : commandant supérieur des troupes au Maroc « 1931-1935 » ; texte : « entre 1931 et 1934 »

    Minor internal contradiction; not resolved by consulted sources.

    Reference given by Wikipedia
    —
    Confidence
    low
    Revision
    oldid=240468951 · 2026-11-07